If we are talking specifically about things I learned from the books we presented on for our final presentation, I will be keeping my thoughts centered on Against Happiness by Owen Flanagan and others. I thought there was a lot of good stuff in this book, especially because it gave a space for many different kinds of people to voice their opinions on specific aspects of happiness. But overall, this book taught me a lot about something I don’t think the authors were aiming to achieve but is still good nonetheless: the order of operations for happiness.
This was an astounding revelation when I figured it out for myself. In an oversimplified way, it sort of changed the way I look at the world. Instead of looking for different ways to spark happiness in my day-to-day life for its own sake, I have started to look where I can help others. Instead of being on my phone to watch TikTok for that sweet, sweet dopamine boost, I have found myself wanting to help more around the house, with my friends, in my church, wherever I may be. Happiness is no longer the input to a good life; it is the output of a good life.
But all this begs the question, does that mean I am doing good things for selfish reasons? Can you really say you are helping others, when in fact, you are doing it for your own happiness? And to that I say: WHO CARES? MrBeast, a very famous and influential YouTuber, has objectively done a lot of good for the world. He has planted thousands of trees, provided life changing eye surgery to those who couldn’t access it, and housed the homeless, all on video. Anybody who has seen the amounts of views this content has garnered him can quickly recognize just how much this man profits off of his charitable acts. Many critics are quick to point out how twisted that sounds, making money off of doing good for others just sounds so selfish! But again, I ask: WHO CARES? Trees are being planted, the blind can see, and people are housed because of his “selfishness.” He’s not doing anything illegal, he’s not hurting anyone in the process to gain his money and influence, so again: WHO CARES? Objective good is being done that might have gone undone if he had not stepped in.
While the above example is extreme, it can still be paired down to what I said before. So what if you do good to make your own life better and to bring yourself happiness? WHO CARES?! Good is still being done! Embrace it! Let yourself feel the happiness produced by inputting good into the world around you.Well, that was quite the spiel, but I think there is some good stuff in there. I mean, how often do I get a chance to spin the copious amounts of anime material I have consumed into something sudo-academic? Not often, I will tell you that! But to conclude, I have had so much fun in this class, and I have learned more than I thought I would. I have learned about myself, I have learned about happiness, and I have learned how to better combine those two things to make something that betters not just me as an individual, but everyone around me as a whole. I have learned that happiness should not be the end goal because there are other end goals whose product will result in happiness when done correctly. In my humble opinion, this class has taught me that spreading goodness, in whatever way one can best, leads to happiness richer than that of the material or the short-term, and doing it for that reason is reason enough.
I agree that that doing good for whatever reason is better than not doing it, or not even trying; but if it became less lucrative for (eg) "Mr. Beast" and he thus stopped doing it, you'd care. Right? You'd have to question his motives. So there seems to be something to Aristotle's and Kant's idea of doing the right thing for the right reasons, at the right time, etc.
ReplyDeleteI think happiness can be a coordinate end, along with justice, equality, dignity, et al. When you fold those all into eudaimonia, you're entitled to agree with WJ that it is indeed "life's chief concern." But the happiness agenda is something else again.