Successor site to the Philosophy of Happiness blog (http://philoshap.blogspot.com/) that supported PHIL 3160 at MTSU, 2011-2019. The course returns Fall 2025.
PHIL 3160 – Philosophy of Happiness
What is it, how can we best pursue it, why should we? Supporting the study of these and related questions at Middle Tennessee State University and beyond. "Examining the concept of human happiness and its application in everyday living as discussed since antiquity by philosophers, psychologists, writers, spiritual leaders, and contributors to pop culture."
Tuesday, September 28, 2021
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You don’t need a pill: Neo
It is not how much we have, but how much we enjoy, that makes happiness True happiness is... to enjoy the present, without anxious dependen...
-
Let's introduce ourselves, fellow Happiness scholars/pursuers. I'm Dr. Oliver, I've been teaching this course in alternate years...
-
UPDATE, Oct. 2 . The schedule is set. For those who've not declared a topic preference, there's still time. Look in the first four c...
-
Some of these questions will likely turn up (in one form or another) on our first exam at the end of September. Reply to any of the discuss...
I just wanted to make a comment on the meme here. It’s something funny about the fact that people are quick to brag on the good deeds they have done. I have had many conversations over whether good deeds are diminished by the fact that you chase credit for them. After all, was it the doing of the good deed or the credit received that was the goal? The intent within your actions play a large role here.
ReplyDeleteThe whole debate here reminds me of those YouTubers that insist on cramming cameras in the face of homeless individuals to get likes, comments, and subscribers. Yes, you helped someone, but you could have done it without the show. Of course, it may be that you also inspired others to do the same in their own life. As always, it’s not all black and white.
I also wanted to comment on the meme you posted. I will agree with Drew here that I always find myself questioning the intentions of said good deeds when they are being boasted about. I can never truly decide to what degree I think ill intentions "tarnish", for lack of better wording, the good deed. Does it completely take away all the "good" even though there may have still been people helped or benefitted? It might change the act from virtuous to selfish, but I can't decide if I think that makes it any less "good".
ReplyDeleteTo a certain extent, I agree with Marcus Aurelius. We are social creatures, and without encouragement, we would probably be much further behind in society. However, if he were to examine his own writings more, he probably would’ve been kinder to Christians than what he was.
ReplyDeleteI come from a belief where humans are inherently selfish and in want of praise of others, call it the invisible hand or just a common viewing of society. If it weren't for the praise and accolades that come with charity, I doubt we would have very many people doing good deeds whether they be a common person or a CEO of a billion dollar corporation.
ReplyDelete