As Montaigne knew...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heaven’s Gaits
What we do when we walk.
By Adam Gopnik
Why people walk is a hard question that looks easy. Upright bipedalism seems such an obvious advantage from the viewpoint of those already upright that we rarely see its difficulty. In the famous diagram, Darwinian man unfolds himself from frightened crouch to strong surveyor of the ages, and it looks like a natural ascension: you start out bending over, knuckles dragging, timidly scouring the ground for grubs, then you slowly straighten up until there you are, staring at the skies and counting the stars and thinking up gods to rule them. But the advantages of walking have actually been tricky to calculate. One guess among the evolutionary biologists has been that a significant advantage may simply be that walking on two legs frees up your hands to throw rocks at what might become your food—or to throw rocks at other bipedal creatures who are throwing rocks at what might become their food. Although walking upright seems to have preceded throwing rocks, the rock throwing, the biologists point out, is rarer than the bipedalism alone, which we share with all the birds, including awkward penguins and ostriches, and with angry bears. Meanwhile, the certainty of human back pain, like the inevitability of labor pains, is evidence of the jury-rigged, best-solution-at-hand nature of evolution...
Walking is the Western form of meditation: “You’re doing nothing when you walk, nothing but walking. But having nothing to do but walk makes it possible to recover the pure sensation of being, to rediscover the simple joy of existing, the joy that permeates the whole of childhood.” There’s a reason, Frederic Gros suggests, that a dominant school of philosophy in the ancient world, revived in the medieval, was called the “peripatetic.” In Raphael’s great fresco of assembled ancient philosophers, conventionally called “The School of Athens,” Plato and Aristotle are shown upright and in movement, peripatetic even when fixed in place by paint, advancing toward the other philosophers rather than enthroned above them. Movement and mind are linked in Western thought... (continues)
“Perhaps walking is best imagined as an 'indicator species,' to use an ecologist's term. An indicator species signifies the health of an ecosystem, and its endangerment or diminishment can be an early warning sign of systemic trouble. Walking is an indicator species for various kinds of freedom and pleasures: free time, free and alluring space, and unhindered bodies.”
“The multiplication of technologies in the name of efficiency is actually eradicating free time by making it possible to maximize the time and place for production and minimize the unstructured travel time in between…Too, the rhetoric of efficiency around these technologies suggests that what cannot be quantified cannot be valued-that that vast array of pleasures which fall into the category of doing nothing in particular, of woolgathering, cloud-gazing, wandering, window-shopping, are nothing but voids to be filled by something more definite, more production, or faster-paced…I like walking because it is slow, and I suspect that the mind, like the feet, works at about three miles an hour. If this is so, then modern life is moving faster than the speed of thought or thoughtfulness.”
― Rebecca Solnit, Wanderlust: A History of Walking
First Montaigne, then Nick Offerman, and now the New Yorker.
ReplyDeleteCall me crazy, but I'm starting to think there's something to this whole "walking" thing.
Perhaps reading a bit more from Solit will get me there.
Interesting enough, I've learned recently that walking, or really any forward motion that is propelled by our body (so biking, but not driving) can have a positive impact on our visual system.
Will have to re-watch that lecture to get a better understanding of the details regarding that and report back.
"I like walking because it is slow, and I suspect that the mind, like the feet, works at about three miles an hour. If this is so, then modern life is moving faster than the speed of thought or thoughtfulness.”
ReplyDeleteThis is so true! Thought needs space to be invited into. That's why the introspective types might be served to go Epicurean and find some sort of garden.
Conversely, when there are plenty of painful things to think about, it might be better to stay busy.
It’s almost like a hamster on a wheel. Why do they run/walk? As far as we know, it’s to expend their built up energy. In the same vein, humans are known to be a persistence hunter species. We hunted by stalking our prey for long distances until it grew too weak to continue. Funny enough, humans were one of the best at this method of hunting. So, maybe we’re just like that hamster there. Some of us just need to exert ourselves a bit to expend all of that built-up energy.
ReplyDelete